Clarification Of Intent
Note: The following is my response to a recent customer question. Occasionally we print these to clarify to all what might be otherwise misunderstood. The question from customer was, “Why can’t the sampled songs on your website be full songs instead of only part of the song?” The names have been changed to protect the innocent.
Dear Bart,
Your letter came to me this morning from our customer service department. I’ve asked that these kinds of responses come to me occasionally so that I could help handle them and help clarify confusions.
As CEO of Watchfire Music and one of its composers I would love that you could hear a full sample of my music on the site, but unfortunately we, as well as the rest of the industry, have learned that if we were to put the full sample on the site, then three generations of people would then steal such and never actually purchase it.
Unfortunately I have to eat. I’m working on overcoming that limitation in life, but I just haven’t gotten there yet. As it is, we live in a world where now much of what we create as musicians and composers is either free or stolen because of file sharing and hacking.
Your short note came across to all of us here as critical. We pride ourselves in our giving. We sell songs that take tens of thousands of dollars to create for 99 cents in a world where music is now even becoming “free” — thereby reducing our much loved occupations to the level of hobbies.
I guess you got me on my soap box here, but when I come across moments like this of such misunderstanding, it usually, these days, puts me right back on that box.
We do offer every possible tool we can think of to help you discover and understand our music. Perhaps you might rethink this in terms of going to the movies. Let’s say they were forced to let you see the movie for free and then, if you saw the whole thing and liked it, then, and only then, you would have to pay for it.
It’s a good analogy.
Perhaps that’s why the movies provide trailers — so that you can get a taste of the film, but not the whole experience … Perhaps look at our samples in the same light.
BTW, iTunes’ samples are :30 seconds long, always starting at the top and usually giving the listener only the intro of the song. (Not much is to be learned from that.) My rule to all our composers is a 1:30 sample including at least a verse and a chorus. That should be enough information to give a good musician a real taste of the song. We also offer the full lyric for free.
And then there’s the purchase: 99 cents to hear the entire song! What professional singer cannot afford that once they have had their taste and are intrigued enough to take the next step? Think about it … 99 cents …
Ah well, perhaps I’ve ruminated on this subject enough. I hope I’ve been able to jog your brain, to clarify a few things and most of all to give you a better understanding of our intentions and our obstacles.
Perhaps this was not the kind of clarity you were pursuing, but it is the truth — like it or not. We don’t happen to like it much and wish this were a different world where people were more to be trusted. 95% of our customers are, in fact, trustworthy. It’s just a very limited few that take negative advantage of the technology. They often cause all the trouble for the rest of us.
At any rate, thanks for communicating — and most of all, thanks for listening.
All the best,
Peter Link
CEO & Creative Director
Watchfire Music
peterlink@watchfiremusic.com
Hallelujah and thank you for this terrific comment and response. Well said and heartfelt!
This reminds me a bit of the “complaint from a non-customer” blog. There really is this ongoing need for educating our fellow church members, etc. on the ethics and reality of our business. I have carefully honed my own little speech on why I do not “give” out a copy of one of my solos, by way of one simple act on the magical Xerox machine. I explain the facts behind the privilege of acquiring these works of art, re-use fees in recording, proper payment for what some perceive as a glorified hobby, and that I once had an accompanist who also worked as a “spy” for ASCAP. She had stories of catching folks red-handed at concerts with illegal copies of things–school orchestras, church choirs, etc. who decided to just buy one and copy 20 more in the office. It may be budget restrictions or just plain being unaware, but it is absolutely all about that clear Commandment on not stealing. Somehow, our definitions of stealing have acquired new and fun titles: ripping off, borrowing, and my personal favorite—sharing. I also no longer use the word “play”, when I refer to my violin work. Haven’t for years. I say “work”. My instrumental and vocal work is just that. Work. Time is money. The product is money. When a current stops flowing, it is stagnant. There needs to be constant circulation, which is a give and take. A favorite hymn says, “Gratitude is riches, complaint is poverty”. So, when we are gratefully willing to pay for these gifts of Soul, we cannot be deprived, we are blessed in our honesty. We find a kind of fresh, newfound sense of abundance on many fronts, an acknowledging of beauty and balance, and uncover our innate unwillingness to cheapen something of value. We cannot be deprived of what we ourselves need, when we bless another by valuing their work. This is love in action. AND, to go along with yet another title from a recent blog…what goes around comes around. Blessings.